|
|
Registriert seit: Nov 2001
Beiträge: 5,534 Likes: 13
Carpal \'Tunnel
|
Carpal \'Tunnel
Registriert seit: Nov 2001
Beiträge: 5,534 Likes: 13 |
In Antwort auf:
Gibt es eigentlich einen einzigen schriftlichen Nachweis, der belegt, dass der Audi V8 JEMALS "D11" geheißen hat.
Hallo Bastian,
in den alten, deutschen Fahrzeugpapieren ist der Typ definitiv als "D11" genannt! Also ist das beim Beantragen der ABE 127 für den V8 so auch von Audi betitelt worden!
---
Gruß aus Bocholt
Kai
|
|
|
|
Vollständiges Thema
|
No 200, its V8
|
Stefan St.
|
19.03.2011 09:29
|
Re: No 200, its V8
|
Anonym
|
19.03.2011 11:22
|
|
Re: No 200, its V8
|
Thomas V.
|
19.03.2011 12:23
|
|
Re: No 200, its V8
|
Benjamin K.
|
19.03.2011 12:26
|
|
Re: No 200, its V8
|
Thomas V.
|
19.03.2011 12:35
|
|
Re: No 200, its V8
|
Anonym
|
19.03.2011 12:30
|
|
Re: No 200, its V8
|
Thomas V.
|
19.03.2011 12:36
|
|
Re: No 200, its V8
|
Roy F
|
19.03.2011 12:39
|
|
Re: No 200, its V8
|
Mario M.
|
21.03.2011 04:46
|
|
Re: No 200, its V8
|
Roy F
|
19.03.2011 12:43
|
|
Re: No 200, its V8
|
Anonym
|
19.03.2011 12:48
|
|
Re: No 200, its V8
|
Davor Kircanski
|
19.03.2011 04:12
|
|
Re: No 200, its V8
|
Michael Ernst
|
19.03.2011 04:14
|
|
Re: No 200, its V8
|
Thomas V.
|
19.03.2011 06:57
|
|
Re: No 200, its V8
|
Roy F
|
19.03.2011 07:04
|
|
Re: No 200, its V8
|
Anonym
|
19.03.2011 07:11
|
|
Re: No 200, its V8
|
Thomas V.
|
19.03.2011 07:26
|
|
Re: No 200, its V8
|
Anonym
|
19.03.2011 10:44
|
|
Re: No 200, its V8
|
Roy F
|
19.03.2011 11:24
|
|
Re: No 200, its V8
|
Alex Schmitz
|
19.03.2011 01:19
|
|
Re: No 200, its V8
|
Stefan St.
|
19.03.2011 10:31
|
|
Re: No 200, its V8
|
Anonym
|
19.03.2011 10:37
|
|
Re: No 200, its V8
|
Stefan St.
|
19.03.2011 11:01
|
|
Re: No 200, its V8
|
Mathias W.
|
19.03.2011 11:44
|
|
Re: No 200, its V8
|
Michael Ernst
|
19.03.2011 01:19
|
Re: No 200, its V8
|
Stefan St.
|
19.03.2011 10:34
|
|
Re: No 200, its V8
|
BerndT
|
19.03.2011 08:58
|
|
Re: No 200, its V8
|
Anonym
|
19.03.2011 09:43
|
|
Re: No 200, its V8
|
BerndT
|
19.03.2011 10:13
|
|
Re: No 200, its V8
|
Anonym
|
19.03.2011 10:17
|
|
Re: No 200, its V8
|
Peter Kreibich
|
20.03.2011 08:04
|
|
Re: No 200, its V8
|
Thomas Müller
|
20.03.2011 08:30
|
|
Re: No 200, its V8
|
BerndT
|
20.03.2011 01:31
|
|
Re: No 200, its V8
|
Norbert Muck
|
20.03.2011 08:43
|
|
Re: No 200, its V8
|
Manfred M.
|
20.03.2011 08:54
|
|
Re: No 200, its V8
|
Frederic S.
|
20.03.2011 05:44
|
|
Re: No 200, its V8
|
Stefan St.
|
20.03.2011 10:40
|
|
Re: No 200, its V8
|
Florian F.
|
20.03.2011 12:54
|
|
Re: No 200, its V8
|
Jörg E.
|
21.03.2011 10:59
|
|
Re: No 200, its V8
|
Maik M.
|
21.03.2011 12:42
|
|
Re: No 200, its V8
|
Christoph Schulte
|
21.03.2011 02:29
|
|
Re: No 200, its V8
|
Frank Ha.
|
21.03.2011 02:35
|
|
Re: No 200, its V8
|
Thomas Müller
|
21.03.2011 02:37
|
|
Re: No 200, its V8
|
Bastian P.
|
21.03.2011 02:39
|
|
Re: No 200, its V8
|
Thomas Müller
|
21.03.2011 02:41
|
|
Re: No 200, its V8
|
Bastian P.
|
21.03.2011 04:17
|
|
Re: No 200, its V8
|
Kai E.
|
21.03.2011 02:48
|
|
Re: No 200, its V8
|
Bastian P.
|
21.03.2011 04:18
|
|
Re: No 200, its V8
|
Kai E.
|
21.03.2011 04:27
|
|
Link in Zwischenablage kopiert |
|
